to rate breeds of dogs before issuing a policy to you? Is this listed on line? I have some friends that have Pits and Rotties and their insurance it higher because of the dogs they own…but these dogs are wonderful, no aggression issues and they have obedience, CD, CGC titles for their dogs…

I have a Husky and a Bernese Mtn dog…are these breeds on the 'bad' list?

If your breed is listed on the 'bad' list, shouldn't the insurance company look at the 'dog' itself instead of the breed? Why should I pay a higher premium if my dog has Obedience, Show titles etc…Should the insurance companies at least LOOK at the titles that the dogs have? The AKC doesn't just 'hand' out titles to dogs. They have to EARN them thru hard work between the owner and dog.

Your thoughts?

It is a shame, but it seems to be a case of the "good" owners having to pay because of the "bad" owners. I can understand the insurance company's refusal to consider AKC titles because it's not the AKC that will have to pay a claim if a situation arises…